Poker study / TableRival
How to review poker hands: example and checklist
Pick one difficult decision. Reconstruct what you knew at that moment, calculate the price and test your assumptions before looking at the result.
What do you need to analyse a poker hand?
A useful review ends with a reason you can check, not just “I should have folded”. Separate the observed actions from your assumptions about the opponent’s cards. Review away from the table, after play has finished.
Record the game format, player count, blinds, antes, rake, positions, starting stacks, your cards and the board. Write each action and amount in order. Distinguish a raise to 8 BB from a raise by 8 BB. BB as a unit means one big blind.
Choose one decision rather than explaining every action at once. Hide the eventual result while you review. A hand revealed at showdown is one observation, not the whole range the opponent could have played this way. The Upswing hand-analysis guide also stresses recording the hand, isolating the difficult spot and checking different assumptions.
If sharing a hand for feedback, remove player names, chat and account identifiers. You need the actions and relevant context, not another player’s personal details.
Worked example: top pair facing a river bet
Invented study hand: six-player cash format, 100 BB starting stacks, blinds 0.5/1 BB, no ante and no rake. You are BTN with K♠ Q♠. The earlier actions describe the example; they are not recommendations for optimal play.
| Street | Action | Pot after action |
|---|---|---|
| Preflop | UTG, HJ and CO fold. BTN raises to 2.5 BB. SB folds. BB adds 1.5 BB to call. | 5.5 BB |
| Flop: Q♦ 8♣ 3♠ | BB checks. BTN bets 2 BB. BB calls. | 9.5 BB |
| Turn: 7♠ | BB checks. BTN checks. | 9.5 BB |
| River: 2♥ | BB bets 7 BB. BTN must decide. | 16.5 BB before calling |
The folded SB’s 0.5 BB stays in the pot. Do not count BB’s posted blind twice. If the seat names are unfamiliar, start with poker positions and action order.
Calling costs 7 BB. The final pot would be 23.5 BB.
7 ÷ 23.5 ≈ 29.8%
This is the break-even equity threshold for calling rather than folding, with no further betting and no rake. It is not your hand’s automatically known equity.
The pot odds guide explains the denominator. Here the river is already dealt, so each possible opponent hand either wins, loses or ties against yours. Our ranges below have no ties.
Change the range and the conclusion changes
Consider two deliberately small, fictional betting ranges. For this exercise only, each listed combination is equally likely after the given actions. This is not a read on real opponents or a solver result.
| Range | Exact combinations | Your win share | Call EV |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 8♦8♥, 3♦3♣, 7♦7♥, A♠J♠ | 1/4 = 25% | −1.125 BB |
| B | 8♦8♥, 3♦3♣, A♠J♠ | 1/3 ≈ 33.3% | +0.833 BB |
Your pair of queens loses to each listed set and beats A♠J♠, whose flush draw missed. The calculation is win share × 23.5 − 7. Calling loses chip value against range A and gains chip value against range B compared with folding. We have not evaluated a raise.
The difficult part is defending the range assumption. A possible combination is not automatically a frequent bet. Your K♠ excludes K♠J♠, but not A♠J♠. Note which hands you beat, which beat you, which cards block combinations and why those hands would reach the river this way. Revisit the board-texture exercises if the turn change is unclear.
This is a cash-format calculation without rake. Tournament prize value also depends on payouts and the other stacks. Do not transplant this answer into an MTT payout decision or a push/fold chart with different assumptions. See PokerStars Learn’s explanation of ICM.
A hand-review checklist you can reuse
Select and copy the checklist into your own notes, or use your browser’s Print command. This page has a print layout. The website does not submit or save anything from this checklist.
- 1. Format and players
- Cash or tournament; number of players; blinds; ante; rake; payout context.
- 2. Seats and stacks
- Your position; opponent positions; effective stack at the start.
- 3. Cards and actions
- Hole cards and suits; board by street; exact action order and amounts.
- 4. One decision
- Street; pot before the bet; bet size; call cost; available alternatives.
- 5. Facts and assumptions
- Hands you beat; hands that beat you; blocked combinations; evidence for their frequencies.
- 6. Check and next exercise
- Calculation; what changes under another assumption; one lesson; one similar spot to revisit.
Filled-in lesson from this example: “Pot 9.5 BB before the bet; call costs 7 BB; threshold 29.8%. I do not know how often the opponent bluffs this line. Next time I will list hands on both sides of the decision instead of treating one showdown as proof.”
1. Why is the denominator 23.5 BB, not 16.5 BB?
The final pot includes your call: 9.5 + 7 + 7 = 23.5 BB. Dividing 7 by 16.5 omits the chips you would add.
2. Range A gives 25% wins; range B gives about 33.3%. What changes?
The 29.8% call threshold stays the same. Under the stated equal weights, range A falls below it and range B is above it. A changed assumption reverses the call-versus-fold comparison.
3. The opponent later shows 88. Does that alone prove the call was a mistake?
No. It tells you which hand occurred this time, not the full distribution of hands behind the bet. Review the decision with the information available before you saw those cards.
Use one filled-in review in your next 20-minute poker study session. You can practise with this fictional hand and virtual chips; no deposit or real-money game is needed.